From Search to Delegation: PhD Scholars’ Reliance on Agentic AI for Scholarly Information Discovery in Zambia
Pages:
66-89Keywords:
Agentic AI; scholarly information discovery; delegation; reliance; verification; PhD scholars; ZambiaAbstract
Context: Academic information discovery is changing as agentic AI systems identify, filter, summarize, compare, and recommend scholarly information. This rapid transformation raises questions about increasing reliance on AI and the continuing need for human oversight of these tasks.
Aim: The study aimed to explore how PhD scholars in Zambia use, delegate, rely on, and verify agentic AI for academic information discovery.
Approach: A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted at four Zambian universities. A total of 220 pen-and-paper questionnaires were distributed between 1 June and 25 July 2026, and 180 complete responses were received. The data were analyzed using frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations.
Key Findings: Participants used agentic AI for numerous information-discovery tasks, with initial summarization being the most commonly delegated task. Reliance was strongest for making scholarly discovery faster and easier. Participants perceived AI as useful and relevant, but confidence in its accuracy and credibility was lower. Verification was consistently high, especially for research claims, citations, bibliographic details, and source existence.
Interpretation: Delegation did not indicate unconditional dependence; rather, scholars combined AI-enabled efficiency with continued human verification.
Contribution: The study identifies a pattern of verified reliance and provides evidence of AI-mediated scholarly information behavior in the underrepresented Zambian and Global South contexts.
References
Abdelrahman, M., Hu, S., Al-Shamaileh, O., Hammady, R., & Nizamuddin, N. (2026). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic literature review of applications, perceptions and ethical implications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-09-2025-0261
Acut, D. P., Malabago, N. K., Malicoban, E. V., Galamiton, N. S., & Garcia, M. B. (2025). “ChatGPT 4.0 ghosted us while conducting literature search”: Modeling the chatbot’s generated non-existent references using regression analysis. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 29(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2426793
Bhardwaj, S., & Choudhary, P. (2026). Generative AI and responsible innovation: Impact of ChatGPT. Cogent Education, 13(1), 2687177. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2687177
Bipasha, N. J., Bhuyan, M. M., & Mezbah-ul-Islam, M. (2026). Exploring the role of demographic and institutional factors in digital information-seeking behavior and digital confidence among students: A study at two public universities in Bangladesh. Information Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669261449207
Boretti, A. (2026). Hallucinations in generative AI: A threat to scholarly integrity and the urgent need for publisher-led academically supervised verification. Energy Research & Social Science, 136, 104720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104720
Cao, Z., & Mao, Z. (2026). Exploring EFL undergraduate students’ critical AI literacy in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 82, 101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101733
Chowdhury, G., & Chowdhury, S. (2025). Generative AI and information access: A sustainability model and a research agenda. Journal of Information Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515251377016
Flores, G. T., Clarence Edriann, C., Dapar, N. J., & Rosario, Z. L. M. D. (2025). Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence (AI) educational tools in research and fact-checking, challenges, and future insights. In 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Ethics (ICAIDE) (pp. 86–90). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIDE65466.2025.11189370
Gavgani, V. Z., Mahami-Oskouei, M., Bazdar, S., & Oghbatalab, M. (2026). Optimizing scholarly literature search: A comparative study of relevance and evidence quality across AI-powered, semantic, and traditional search engines. Information Discovery and Delivery. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-02-2026-0049
Han, C., Manoharan, S., Ye, X., & Speidel, U. (2026). Phantom citations: An empirical study of non‐existent and unverifiable references in scholarly literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70104
He, X., Huang, H., & Li, J. (2026a). Depend less, think more: How AI knowledge empowers doctoral students’ innovation behavior. Education and Information Technologies, 31(7), 2099–2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13882-1
He, X., Li, S., Cha, R., Wang, L., Shen, Y., Wu, R., Wu, L., Gong, X., & Liu, J. (2026b). Artificial intelligence dependency in college students: A critical narrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1808268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1808268
Hosseini, M., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Holmes, K., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2025). Open science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities. Quantitative Science Studies, 6, 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00337
Kamińska, A. M. (2026). From instrument to institution: Generative AI and the epistemic dispossession of the academic library. Journal of Documentation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2026-0121
Kasakewitch, J. P. G., Lima, D. L., Balthazar Da Silveira, C. A., Sanha, V., Rasador, A. C., Cavazzola, L. T., Mayol, J., & Malcher, F. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence large language models in literature search assistance to evaluate inguinal hernia repair approaches. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 35(6), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0277
Lund, B. D., Teel, Z. A., Mohammed, Y., Jagathpally, A., & Wang, T. (2026). Artificial intelligence (AI) and information seeking: A comparative exploration of AI chatbots, search engines, and library resources as information sources among university students. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006261438484
Mei, K. X., Pang, R. Y., Lyford, A., Wang, L. L., & Reinecke, K. (2026). Passing the buck to AI: How individuals’ decision-making patterns affect reliance on AI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 33(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3786326
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Cai, Y., Collier, T., Tahamtan, I., & Eftekhar, A. (2026). Is generative AI reshaping academic practices worldwide? A survey of adoption, benefits, and concerns. Information Processing & Management, 63(1), 104350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104350
OECD. (2026). The agentic AI landscape and its conceptual foundations (OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 56). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/396cf758-en
Oladokun, B. D., Enakrire, R. T., Emmanuel, A. K., Ajani, Y. A., & Adetayo, A. J. (2025). Hallucitation in scientific writing: Exploring evidence from ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4o in responses to selected questions in librarianship. Journal of Web Librarianship, 19(1), 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2025.2482093
Pudasaini, S. (2026). From credibility to reliance: Trust in generative AI as an academic information source. Information Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669261468286
Ringo, D. S. (2025). The effect of generative AI use on doctoral students’ academic research progress: The moderating role of hedonic gratification. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2475268. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2475268
Shao, E., Wang, Y., Qian, Y., Pan, Z., Liu, H., & Wang, D. (2026). SciSciGPT: Advancing human–AI collaboration in the science of science. Nature Computational Science, 6(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-025-00906-6
Shavit, Y., Agarwal, S., Brundage, M., Adler, S., O’Keefe, C., Campbell, R., Lee, T., Mishkin, P., Eloundou, T., Hickey, A., Slama, K., Ahmad, L., McMillan, P., Beutel, A., Passos, A., & Robinson, D. G. (2023). Practices for governing agentic AI systems [White paper]. OpenAI. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/practices-for-governing-agentic-ai-systems.pdf
Shomotova, A., & ElSayary, A. (2026). AI use and research integrity in higher education: Faculty perspectives on opportunities, challenges, strategies, and misconduct. Higher Education Quarterly, 80(3), e70136. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70136
Suchikova, Y., Tsybuliak, N., Teixeira Da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2026). GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing. Accountability in Research, 33(3), 2544331. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2544331
Tang, A., Li, K., Kwok, K. O., Cao, L., Luong, S., & Tam, W. (2024). The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 56(2), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12938
Tomczyk, P., Brüggemann, P., Mergner, N., & Petrescu, M. (2026). Are AI tools better than traditional tools in literature searching? Evidence from e-commerce research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 58(1), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241295802
Watson, A. P. (2024). Hallucinated citation analysis: Delving into student-submitted AI-generated sources at the University of Mississippi. The Serials Librarian, 85(5–6), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2024.2433640
Yadav, V., Trushna, T., Mandal, U. K., Singh, M., Goel, A. D., Bairwa, M., Dabar, D., & Sabde, Y. D. (2026). AI-assisted search strategy construction with step-by-step instructions to execute and manage searches across major databases. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 45(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2025.2595567
Zhao, R., Ar Rakib, N., Shi, Q., Han, S., & Mostafa, J. (2026). AskAda: An AI-anchored conversational agent for scholarly information seeking in educational contexts to improve learning. In Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ’26) (pp. 371–375). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3786304.3787915
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dalitso Mvula (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright in their work and grant the Journal of Scholarly Research and Metrics (JSRM) the right of first publication.
Articles published in JSRM are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation of the work in any medium or format, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.